This board is dedicated to the discussion of history and the other humanities such as philosophy, religion, law, classical artwork, archeology, anthropology, ancient languages, etc. Please use /lit/ for discussions of literature. Threads should be about specific topics, and the creation of "general" threads is discouraged.
For the purpose of determining what is history, please do not start threads about events taking place less than 25 years ago. Historical discussions should be focused on past events, and not their contemporary consequences. Discussion of modern politics, current events, popular culture, or other non-historical topics should be posted elsewhere. General discussions about international culture should go on /int/. <u>/his/ is not /pol/</u>, and Global Rule #3 is in effect. Do not try to treat this board as /pol/ with dates. Blatant racism and trolling will not be tolerated, and a high level of discourse is expected. History can be examined from many different conflicting viewpoints; please treat other posters with respect and address the content of their post instead of attacking their character. When discussing history, <u>please reference credible source material</u>, and provide as much supporting information as possible in your posts.
Why does the bible say it's better not to be born?
Modern Jews follow the talmud, they are talmudists
Christians are the only ones who respect the old testament Maybe I am wrong but that's the impression I get
>>11124758 >sjw temple
You should join the division, anon.
oh i didnt' even notice this before lol
surely it's... a heresy of ... yawhism? or direct succession, depending on whether that god is the devil after all.
>>11127807 >>NOOOOOOO MOMMMMMMYYY THE MEAN MAN ON THE INTERNET EXPECTS ME TO ARGUE PROPERLY
woww dude this is some dated shit from a 40 yr old from the early internet days
Yeah, retard, you're expected to speak properly and not open your posts with
>neck yourself >schizo >cunt
>"denying having said stuff"
and act offended when you're called out on it, it's just weird asocial mind games: faggotry was the word we used to use for this.
don't be a faggot, anon. life rules 101.
Apostolic Succession ain't optional. The church of Christ must be strengthened by the words of heretics. Patriarch Kirill aka "P.K." is not my patriarch, he is a russian government agent and probably a schismatic :DD. apostolic SEE not patriarchate of GREECE okay. praise Jesus.
Why didnt women fight for Fascism like they did for Communism?
As an actual housewife housework fucking sucks. Only positive aspect is that with modern appliances I only spend like 2 hours a day actually working, but no part of housework is fun or fulfilling.
lol German vet would make the clown beg for mercy.
>>11129288 >2 hours a day working
way to answer your own question retard
>women on /his/
Because Communism treats women like man or even more comfortably, they got a system behind them which comforts them to both be home takers and workers, really progressive. And in Fascism they are treated like in the middle ages. Also people in post ww2 communism were more ready for war then fascist ever were, even women like i said up there
Except many of the modern conveniences that allow me to have a two hour work day either weren't common in fascist countries in the 1930s and 40s or women weren't raised around such conveniences.
Explain to me why coping Trotskyoids think it isn't real communism.
>>11128277 >bring harmony >China is filled with collapsing buildings, rift with corruption and crime, and exploding factories
Communists don't bring harmony; they just conceal lies
>>11129057 >i watched the liveleak videos of the most populated country in the world therefore thats what all of China is like all the time
Let's roll the footage of people getting sniped in broad daylight in the Chicago ghettos
It ain't real communism. Every leftist and politically literate man knows that, not just the Trotskyist who was surely intelectualy raping you
>>11129094 >I will continue to conceal the truth
Pushing goalposts doesn't make me any less, right commie.
>china and india in 1940: both stagnant, corrupted impoverished shitholes that manage to scrape out a small amount of relevance via their massive populations >china in 2020: a rising, disciplined economic powerhouse that is expanding domestic infrastructure at fantastic speeds and spreading its anti Western geopolitical and military influence across three continents and two oceans at a rate that would make the Soviet KGB turn green with envy >India in 2020: a mutilated excuse of a nation-state of several dozen different squabbling ethnicities/cultures/religions that was/is held together only via communal seethe against the British, and remains a comparatively stagnant, incompetent shithole that's a mild regional power at best and a complete underachiever at worst what went right for the former and what went wrong for the latter?
hands the colour of feces typed this post
>>11129338 >If China had 10 millions inhabitants it would be nothing
this could be said of any large and success enjoying nation anon. Human beings are the most important resource of any country
In less than 20 years the economy of India will be bigger than the US
about a decade down the line poojeets will be a relevant global economic power (they’re projected to cross Japan by 2030 to become #3), but chinks would’ve surpassed US by then to become #1.
the thing with poojeets and chinks is that they can’t fight a full fledged war cuz Mother Nature has placed a giant mountain range between them to calm down their dicklet rage. so what you’ll see is that pakis will be used by chinks against poojeets. as well as chinks will try to expand into India’s waters in the Indian Ocean and get hold of major trade routes
no poojeet you will surpass Japan by 2030. but you’ll still be behind the US for a very long time
>fundamentally incapable of taking and holding white land unless someone else won it for them Is this true?
they are a tax haven but they still have a superior QoL than anglos
and that map also proves the superiority of Germany, Austria, France and others
>>11129197 >superioty of France
But they have more niggers than the UK?
still seething nigel?
the pakis which groom and rape british children are protected from on high by the british government
where were the non-whites at the Plains of Abraham?
He has never been refuted
The inferior man knows not the ordinances of Heaven and therefore reveres them not, is unduly familiar in the presence of great men, and scoffs at the words of sages.
Wow it's truly over manlets.
is it a question?
He was BTFO'd by Lao Tzu
>"The people suffer from famine because of the multitude of taxes consumed by their superiors. It is through this that they suffer famine.
The people are difficult to govern because of the (excessive) agency of their superiors (in governing them). It is through this that they are difficult to govern."
China has had multiple famines because of the Confucius ideology of too government control, and so many fucking rebellions because the Chinese government would never leave people alone.
>>11129027 >China has had multiple famines because of the Confucius ideology of too government control, and so many fucking rebellions because the Chinese government would never leave people alone.
Its better than legalism at least.
Why did the children of the North Eastern elite take such an interest in Jim Crow and the Civil Rights Movement in the mid-late 60’s? White Northerners seemed to be pretty indifferent towards segregation in the South before then.
>>11129283 >>11129384 >i-i-it was the "children of northern elites"!!1! >n-n-no? >w-well FUCK NIGGERS
get off the internet dixoids, no one wants you here
>>11129376 >The ADA grew out of a predecessor group, the Union for Democratic Action (UDA). The UDA was formed by former members of the Socialist Party of America and Committee to Defend America by Aiding the Allies as well as labor union leaders, liberal politicians, theologians, and others who were opposed to the pacifism adopted by most left-wing political organizations >James Isaac Loeb (later an ambassador and diplomat in the John F. Kennedy administration), the UDA's executive director, advocated disbanding the UDA and forming a new, more broadly based, mass-membership organization >Leveraging Truman's lack of popular support, the ADA succeeded in pushing Truman leftward on issues such as civil rights. It also led a full-scale attack on Progressive Party candidate and former US vice president Henry A. Wallace because of his opposition to the Marshall Plan and support for appeasement of the Soviet Union. The ADA portrayed Wallace and his supporters as dupes of the Communist Party. Adolf A. Berle Jr. and Franklin Delano Roosevelt Jr. expressed their belief that Eisenhower would accept the nomination.
Where does this say they created civil rights?